This story was originally published on Social Media Today. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Social Media Today newsletter. With generative artificial intelligence (AI) ...

With major legal battles unfolding in both the UK (Getty v. Stability AI) and the U.S. (including Kramer v. Meta, The New York Times v. OpenAI, and Bartz v. Anthropic), the outcomes are set to reshape ...

The law remains unsettled; fair use outcomes are highly fact-specific and may differ for generative versus non-generative AI models. Copyright holders should focus on ...

Anthropic has agreed to a $1.5 billion settlement with authors in a landmark copyright case. Anthropic has agreed to a $1.5 billion settlement with authors in a landmark copyright case, marking one of ...

The biggest copyright case of the AI era won’t go to trial, we’ve learnt this week, as Anthropic, the company behind the Claude chatbot, chose to settle what the firm said was “possibly” the largest ...

There's a kaleidoscope of copyright cases aimed at setting boundaries on what AI companies can and can't do with human-produced creative work. Like with other decisions, a recent ruling in Getty's AI ...

The Chamber of Progress, a self-styled “progressive” industry trade group supported by most of the biggest tech platforms, has urged the Trump administration to intervene in a litany of copyright ...

Artificial intelligence startup Anthropic has agreed to pay a record-setting $1.5 billion to a group of book authors and publishers in order to settle a class action lawsuit. The payout is thought to ...

“The outcome of [Cox v. Sony] could have ripple effects in other industries, including AI, where systems are often used to generate infringing works without the direct knowledge of the service ...