The U.S. Supreme Court sided with an Idaho couple in a significant environmental case against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) over a plan to develop a small lot near Priest Lake.

Civil servants told POLITICO they’re anxious and exhausted, but holding out hope their lawyers can still save their jobs.

The Supreme Court limited the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to regulate emissions. NPR's Michel Martin asks former EPA head William K. Reilly how that will impact the agency's goals.

Supreme Court rules against EPA on Clean Water Act case 04:53. Washington — The Supreme Court on Thursday curtailed the Environmental Protection Agency's authority to regulate certain wetlands ...

The Supreme Court's ruling that curbs the power of the EPA will slow its ability to respond to the climate crisis, but "does not take the EPA out of the game," according to its administrator.

Practically, the court’s ruling says the EPA can’t write rules similar to the Obama-era Clean Power Plan. But it didn’t explicitly say how EPA should regulate going forward, environmental ...

The US Supreme Court, in a 6-3 ruling this morning, “sharply curtailed” the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) options to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from existing power ...

Supreme Court’s EPA ruling is a win for the country Although we celebrate this first step, our ... The Supreme Court had to keep the CDC out of the rental property business.

Ruling in favor of coal-producing states, Supreme Court says Congress, not the EPA, has the authority to make decisions on fighting climate change.

Today’s major environmental ruling from the Supreme Court, West Virginia v.EPA, is probably most notable for what it did not do.. It did not say that the Environmental Protection Agency is ...

Supreme Court EPA ruling might have sweeping impact to restrict the administrative state. Actions involving the SEC, FCC and crypto might all be reined in.